The materials below were reviewed for Readiness for Dissemination. The implementation
point of contact can provide information regarding implementation of the intervention
and the availability of additional, updated, or new materials.
Aggressors, Victims, and Bystanders training agenda
Education Development Center. (2007). Aggressors, Victims, and Bystanders training. Newton, MA: Author.
Education Development Center. (n.d.). Aggressors, Victims, and Bystanders: Thinking and Acting To Prevent Violence. Student handouts and transparencies. Newton, MA: Author.
Program Web site, http://www.thtm.org
Slaby, R. G., Wilson-Brewer, R., & Dash, K. (1994). Aggressors, Victims, and Bystanders: Thinking and Acting To Prevent Violence. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
Readiness for Dissemination Ratings by Criteria (0.0-4.0 scale)
External reviewers independently evaluate the intervention's Readiness for Dissemination
using three criteria:
- Availability of implementation materials
- Availability of training and support resources
- Availability of quality assurance procedures
For more information about these criteria and the meaning of the ratings, see Readiness for Dissemination.
Training and Support
Implementation materials include sufficient background information as well as clear guidance for addressing sensitive issues. A comprehensive training supplemented by a formal curriculum is available to implementers through an annual training at the developer's site or through on-site training provided by a national network of certified trainers. The program developer is available to answer implementer questions and provide consultation via e-mail and phone. Several scales are recommended to support a systematic evaluation of some outcomes, and checklists included in the curriculum can be used to support implementation fidelity.
The method for accessing training and support is unclear, as are the scope and extent of available support. No clear process for assessing implementation fidelity or effectiveness is described. The outcome and fidelity tools lack sufficient detail on using the tools and interpreting results.